Date of publication
Jul 08, 2026
Category:
Commentary
Walking the line: balancing benefits of public engagement against the risks of harassment and attack
by
Jana Laura Egelhofer
,
Mr Niels G. Mede
,
Fabien Medvecky
,
Dr Thomas James Carruthers
,
Alice Fleerackers
,
Miguel Garcia-Guerrero
,
Mr Bernard Okebe
Harassment, political interference, and violence against science communication are on the rise and pose considerable challenges for scientists, journalists, communicators, and institutions. In this commentary, we — an international group of researchers and practitioners — reflect on how scientists, science communicators and their institutions can balance the increased demand for meaningful public engagement while also appropriately responding to escalating harms of backlash. Drawing on existing literature and lived experience, we interrogate the consequences of attacks on science communication and review available support structures for scientists and practitioners. We propose ways to improve preparedness for and responses to public and political backlash, while considering the challenge of mitigating harassment without silencing valuable public feedback. In doing so, we aim to contribute to a resilient environment for scientists and communicators engaging with publics and to promote a more constructive discourse on socially contested issues in science and technology.