Browse all Publications

Filter by keyword: Science writing

Publications including this keyword are listed below.

Mar 21, 2003 Article
Tropes, science and communication

by Daniele Gouthier and Marcello Di Bari

Compared to expert-to-expert - or peer-to-peer - communication, the language of popular science is characterised by a wider use of figurative devices. This applies to all forms of verbal and non-verbal communication. Specialized texts are characterised by a restricted and rigorous lexicon both in spoken and - even more so - in written language. Namely, a widespread use of terms which are monosemic, unambiguous and non context-dependent terms, and a minimum amount of natural linguistic choices. The few polysemic, ambiguous and context-dependent words encountered in a scientific text are highly functional, since meaning is mainly conveyed through field-specific terms. The same rules apply to the iconography of a scientific text, where most pictures are graphs, diagrams or schemes. Their purpose is to give the reader a visual photo-like equivalent of the concepts discussed in the text. These images are all the more effective thanks to the use of colours, external references, highlighting and other devices, which make them functional to their explanatory purpose.

Volume 2 • Issue 01 • 2003

Mar 21, 2002 Commentary
Eight points about science communication

by Domenico Parisi

This item is available only in the original language

Volume 1 • Issue 01 • 2002