Search

Date of publication Jun 21, 2007 Category: Commentary

The science and society movement and the MUSE project

by Michele Lanzinger

For the purpose of this article, Science & Society (S&S) is referred to as that current of thoughts and those cultural initiatives aimed at fostering dialogue between research, scientific and technical output on the one hand and society on the other, so as to allow people to make conscious decisions about science and the sustainability of its developments. This concept underlies the elaboration of the MUSE cultural concept, the new Science Museum in Trent, Northern Italy.

Volume 6Issue 022007
Date of publication Jun 21, 2007 Category: Book Review

History, science and society. Research on science in Italy in the modern and contemporary world

by Francesca Riccioni

The digitalization process of historical archives, which has been taking place over the past few years, shows that the study of history of science is undergoing major changes. Easier access to online resources (manuscripts, catalogues of scientific machinery and tools that would otherwise be virtually impossible to consult) has spurred and created the preconditions for the development of new quantitative methodologies in the study of history of science as well as the creation of international research groups.

Volume 6Issue 022007
Date of publication Jun 21, 2007 Category: Commentary

The Lisbon post-its: how science-in-society issues were reflected in the last ECSITE meetings

by Paola Rodari , Matteo Merzagora

ECSITE is the European network of science centres and museums (www.ecsite.net). The ECSITE Annual Conference, attended every year by several hundreds of professionals in science museums and science centres (870 at the last edition), and the ECSITE director forum, where full members of the association discuss on focused topics, are excellent observation points. Looking at what goes on in these meetings allows to track what is high on the agenda of the science-centre community, how the focus of interest moves, what are the main concerns of museum professionals.

Volume 6Issue 022007
Date of publication Jun 21, 2007 Category: Commentary

The role of science centres and museums in the dialogue between science and society

by Paola Rodari , Matteo Merzagora

In a meta-analysis carried out in 2002, the two main associations of science centres and museums (ASTC, mainly US-centered, and ECSITE, mainly European) gathered all studies analysing the impact of science centres and museums on their local communities1. Four types of impact were identified: personal, social, political and economical. It was noticed that the vast majority of studies concentrated on the personal impact (that is, learning outcome, visitor satisfaction, etc.), while the latter three were largely neglected. The very fact of pointing this out, and many recent experiences - some of which are included in this commentary - show that there is now a shift of attention.

Science museums in a knowledge-based society
by Pietro Greco

The first kiss of science - From interactivity to dialogue
by Juan Nepote

Education, facilitation and inclusion - The tunisinian experience
by Adel Zouaoui

The science and society movement and the MUSE project
by Michele Lanzinger

The Lisbon post-its: how science-in-society issues were reflected in the last ECSITE meetings
by Paola Rodari and Matteo Merzagora

Volume 6Issue 022007
Date of publication Mar 21, 2007 Category: Editorial

Patterns for dialogue: under construction

by Pietro Greco

NASA has decided to cut by 50% the next two-year budget for the Astrobiology Institute (NAI), and for all of the studies on life in outer space. This reduction follows an announcement made by Dr Michael Griffin, the Administrator of the space agency of the United States Government when, in addressing the Mars Society last summer, he clearly stated that xenobiology studies are marginal to the mission of NASA.

Volume 6Issue 012007
Date of publication Mar 21, 2007 Category: Commentary

Boom and bust in popular science

by Jon Turney

The obvious thing to say about popular science publishing in the last twenty years is that there has been a lot of it! That is important in itself. But it also means it is hazardous to offer general comment. The British journalist and commentator Bryan Appleyard recently wrote in the Sunday Times that the “hard stuff” in science was no longer attracting so many readers. Books answering many small questions about the world, or evoking a sense of wonder, do better - he reckons - than those which offer large certainties based on a scientific, or scientistic view of the world. That type, Appleyard claims, dominated the field for years after Steven Hawking’s A Brief History of Time, with its promise of a theory of everything.

Volume 6Issue 012007
Date of publication Mar 21, 2007 Category: Article

Science and technology in a mediatized and democratized society

by Pieter A. Maeseele

We inhabit an age in which economic progress in the European Union is equalized to more European research and better communication of that European research to the public. In highly developed Western democracies this implies an important role for the public as well as the mass media, both actors in a transforming public sphere. Beyond a call for more communication and more scientific literacy, the discourse has shifted to a call for more engagement and more participation on behalf of the citizen. There is a widespread sentiment however that the discipline of science communication is at a crossroads. In this paper it is argued that in a context of life politics and an increasing displacement of politics, one has to account for the trajectories of issue formation and the detours of public-ization to understand the dynamics of techno-scientific issues.

Volume 6Issue 012007
Date of publication Mar 21, 2007 Category: Book Review

Jaap Willems and Winfried Goepfert (eds.), Science and the power of TV, VU University press and Da Vinci Institute, Amsterdam, 2006

by Matteo Merzagora

We live in a period where new media develops at amazing speed: the case of Youtube, becoming in few months one of the most visited website in the world, or the incredibly fast diffusion of audio and video podcasting, or the acquired relevance and authoritativeness of blogs in the dissemination of scientific information, are paradigmatic. Yet, there is little doubt that old media such as traditional television remain a reference for the largest sector of the population. Indeed, all surveys show that when dealing with scientific information, television remains the most relevant medium by a large majority of European (although in eastern Europe, due to a more trustful reputation, radio has also a particularly relevant position, and the internet is gaining favour among younger audiences).

Volume 6Issue 012007
Date of publication Mar 21, 2007 Category: Commentary

The role by scientific publications in science communication

by Martha Fabbri

In their contributions to this special issue, the British science writer Jon Turney and the American scholar Bruce Lewenstein discuss the validity of the book as a means for science communication in the era of the Internet, whereas the article by Vittorio Bo deals with scientific publishing in a broader sense.

Boom and bust in popular science
by Jon Turney

Why should we care about science books?
by Bruce Lewenstein

Scientific publishing: some food for thought
by Vittorio Bo

Volume 6Issue 012007
Date of publication Mar 21, 2007 Category: Commentary

Scientific publishing: some food for thought

by Vittorio Bo

Scientific publishing, here to be considered in a broader sense, as publishing of both specialised scientific journals and science popularisation works addressed to a wider audience, has been sailing for some years on troubled waters. To gather some possible food for thought is the purpose of this brief article.

Volume 6Issue 012007

Search results