Length: 3000 - 5000 words

Contributions are invited that reflect on project evaluations, action/research projects or similar studies focused on practical examples of science communication. The papers should present a science communication case study of broad interest to the practice or research community, reflecting on the learning and insights gained.

Structure and content:

Contributions should present the context for the case study, reviewing relevant academic or other literature used to support the development of the project.

Details of any data collection methods should be included and data collection instruments can be included as supplementary material. However, the focus of Practice Insights is to draw critical learning from case studies, and as such the presentation of data may be more informal than for an academic paper.

It is essential to discuss implications for future projects. Contributions should present a deep reflection on experience and allow lessons learnt to emerge. Although an extensive bibliography is not required, Practice Insights should refer to relevant literature.

Figures:

Authors are encouraged to include images (e. g. photographs or materials) that enhance the description of the case study. Authors are also encouraged to include figures, tables or other graphics to present data when appropriate.